Misconceptions about automation testing
Instead of being something that is employed at the very end when the project is finished, automated testing has become more and more integrated with the software development processes and project executions. Automation testing when used properly has shown to be effective in offering a full range of features that help in the development of better solutions.
Several aspects of automated testing have been misinterpreted, despite the fact that it has been universally acknowledged as a significant actor in software development. Here are some of the widespread misconceptions regarding automated testing. The reality behind these misconceptions will also be examined in order to establish clarity and correct the facts that are incorrect.
1.Automation testing is more expensive than Manual testing.
It is true that investing in automated testing requires a significant initial financial outlay. You must either buy the program, employ testers who are knowledgeable about using it and have the necessary skills, or train them on how to use it.
However, when utilised properly, automated testing might actually reduce your costs. Compared to automated testing, manual testing requires more time from your testers, time that could be used more effectively on other development processes. You may estimate the overall cost of automated testing over the course of a few years and contrast it with your productivity and the extra time you have available. You will discover that, when viewed as a long-term investment, automated testing is not as expensive as one may believe and, in fact, can increase profitability.
2.You don’t need any experience to carry out automation testing.
Automated software testing demands a certain level of expertise even though it is considerably simpler to do so. To conduct automated tests, you just need a fundamental understanding of testing, not the comprehensive testing knowledge required for scripting and manual testing.
It is important to realise that writing test scripts differs from writing test cases because automated scripts are composed of software codes and tools cannot perform all tasks. Additionally, you need to know how to handle the modules and components of the automation software and how to use it effectively if you want to get the most out of it.
3.You can automate all of your tests.
Automated testing can be a huge asset in speeding up and lowering the time required for the process. However, it doesn’t follow that you should use automated testing for all of your testing requirements. You must keep in mind that the codes created by manual tests serve as the foundation for automated testing. When to prioritise the tests and when to automate should be known.
Some tests are better off being run manually, while others are so lengthy that doing them manually would take a lot of time and be prone to human error. In these situations, it is best to use automated testing. Therefore, you can’t totally exclude manual testing from your process when you start adopting automated testing.
4.Not everything that is said about automation testing is correct.
Although not all of the faults discovered by the automated program are true errors, automated testing will assist in identifying various application issues. The testers should be able to recognize it if it occasionally displays false positives, which is probable. The ability to code and write scripts with the intention of making the most of software application tools is still required for automated testing.
5.It is easy to manage automation testing.
It is important to remember that not everything will be ready-made as a result of automated testing. Setting up an automated test and then forgetting about it is not an option. The source code must be correctly maintained on a regular basis for automated tests.
It goes without saying that all of your organisational needs cannot always be the same, and all of your projects cannot utilise the same software. As a result, the code must be modified to fit the requirements of the project and your development procedures. When you use automated testing, it takes time and patience in addition to the skills to apply it properly.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it is clear that automated testing enhances quality assurance, but a lack of awareness about it can occasionally backfire, therefore it is time to educate everyone involved in the software development process. The project managers will be able to make educated judgments and take full benefit of the automated testing software with the help of these false beliefs about automated testing. All in all, automated testing is very effective as it helps to run tests without any manual help efficiently and within a short period of time. Join this automation testing course to learn more.
