Error handling Testing

Error handling Testing

Table of Contents

Error handling testing is a type of software testing which is performed to test the ability of the system to handle the errors and exceptions in the software during runtime. This testing is performed with the help of both developers and testers. Error handling techniques should include handling both errors and exception scenarios.

What is Error Handling Testing?

Error handling testing is the process of verifying that a software application can properly handle error conditions, whether they are caused by user input, system malfunctions, or unexpected external events. The goal is to ensure that when errors occur, the system can either recover from them gracefully or provide clear information to the user or developer about the issue.

This testing methodology ensures that software behaves predictably and does not crash or behave unpredictably under stress or in the presence of errors. It also guarantees that users are presented with meaningful error messages rather than cryptic codes that may confuse or frustrate them.

Why is Error Handling Testing Important?

Error handling testing is essential for several reasons:

Improves Software Reliability: Error handling mechanisms allow applications to recover from unexpected failures, making them more reliable.

Enhances User Experience: Well-designed error messages and recovery processes improve user satisfaction, as users are better informed about what went wrong and how to fix it.

Reduces System Downtime: Effective error handling can prevent system crashes and downtime, ensuring smooth business operations.

Identifies Vulnerabilities: Testing how systems handle errors can help identify vulnerabilities or potential areas where bugs may exist.

Meets Compliance Requirements: In some industries, such as finance or healthcare, error handling testing is a compliance requirement to ensure data integrity and system availability.

Objective of Error handling testing:

The objectives of error handling testing:

  • To check the system ability to handle errors.
  • To check system highest soak point.
  • To do sure errors can be handles properly by the system in the future.
  • To do system capable of execution handling also.

Steps involved in the error handling testing

Test Environment:

The Qa software testing courses technique influences the setup of the test environment so that the testing process can run smoothly. This step includes planning for testing. A system that is going to be tested is made sure have to less significant data as there might be crashes in the system during testing.

Test case Generation:

Generate the test cases create the deliberate errors and exceptions and observe for the software handles it. Suppose software operates on fractions then setting the denominator of a fraction is zero. Test case generation is associated with the developing team as without knowing the internal code, test cases will not be designed.

Test Case Execution:

Once the test case generation and the real testing process begin, it is the most prominent part of the testing process. It includes running the program over the test case generated.

Result Analysis:

Execution of the test case, its result is analyzed. It involves testing the inconsistency of the expected output for generated test cases. There may be a chance of the program is going into an infinite loop which will lead up to software failure.

5Re-test:

If the testing has failed, it is reported as a defect to developers. After the defect is fixed, then once more all the above steps are performed to test the system. It also includes the system under new test cases generated.

Verification in Exception handling:

The exception handling routine programs are written by the developers to handle the exceptions and display the appropriate exception message to the user. In order to declare that exception handling routines are robust enough, it is necessary to present the code with a wide array of invalid or maybe unexpected inputs such as it can be created via software fault injection and mutation testing techniques. Protocol software is the most difficult one for which we can handle the errors and exceptions. Since a protocol implementation must be prepared to receive input that does not comply with the relevant specifications.

In order to ensure that meaningful regression analysis can be conducted throughout a software development lifecycle process any exception handling verification should be automated, test cases will be generated in a scientific, repeatable fashion. Commercially available systems exist that perform such testing.

Advantages:

  1. Helps us to construct to an error handling powered software.
  2. It always makes the software ready for all circumstances.
  3. It develops the exception handling technique in the software.
  4. Helps  is maintenance of the software.

Disadvantages

  • It is not budget friendly as both the developing and testing team is involved.
  • The testing effort if high.

Best Practices for Error Handling

To implement robust error handling mechanisms, consider the following best practices:

Graceful Degradation

If the system encounters an error that cannot be recovered from, it should degrade gracefully. This means shutting down non-essential features while keeping the core functionality intact. For example, a payment system might disable one payment method if it fails while still allowing users to complete transactions with another.

Meaningful Error Messages

Ensure that error messages are clear and helpful. They should explain what went wrong and what the user can do to resolve the issue. Avoid using technical jargon in messages meant for end-users. For example, instead of “Error 404: Resource not found,” use “The page you’re looking for is not available. Please check the URL or try again later.”

Error Logging

Implement comprehensive logging for errors, especially for errors that are not visible to the user. Logs are essential for diagnosing issues in production environments and for troubleshooting complex systems. Ensure that sensitive data is not exposed in the logs.

Retry and Timeout Mechanisms

In cases where an error might be transient (such as a network issue), implement retry mechanisms with appropriate delays. Ensure that there is a timeout mechanism in place so that the system does not become stuck in a retry loop indefinitely.

Fail Fast

In certain situations, it is better for the system to fail fast rather than try to continue operating in an unstable state. For example, if the system detects that a critical resource is unavailable, it should fail immediately rather than trying to operate with degraded performance.

Test Error Scenarios Regularly

Make error handling tests a part of your regular testing cycle. This will help ensure that new features or changes to the system do not introduce new error handling issues.

Tools for Error Handling Testing

Several tools can assist with error handling testing by simulating errors and monitoring how systems respond. Here are some popular options:

Chaos Monkey: Originally developed by Netflix, Chaos Monkey randomly terminates instances in production to test a system’s resilience to failures.

Fiddler: This tool allows developers to simulate network errors by intercepting and modifying HTTP requests.

JUnit: A popular testing framework for Java that allows for testing exceptions and error conditions in unit tests.

Sentry: A tool for real-time error tracking that provides detailed reports on errors in production environments.

Postman: Often used for API testing, Postman allows testers to simulate different response statuses to test error handling in RESTful APIs.

Conclusion

Error handling testing is a crucial aspect of software quality assurance that ensures applications can manage and recover from errors gracefully. It improves the overall reliability of software systems, enhances user experience, and helps meet compliance requirements in certain industries.

By identifying potential error scenarios, simulating errors, and verifying recovery mechanisms, teams can build software that is resilient and robust. By following best practices such as implementing clear error messages, comprehensive logging, and retry mechanisms, developers can ensure that their applications are well-prepared for any errors that come their way.

Share this article
Subscribe
By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read our Privacy Policy.
Need a Free Demo Class?
Join H2K Infosys IT Online Training